• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Join Self-Employed Australia
  • Protected Members
    • Tax Audit Support
    • Unfair Contract Help
  • About US
    • Who We Are
    • SEA Board
    • Annual Reports
    • No Spam Policy
    • Content Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
  • Log in/Log out
  • Update your details

Self Employed Australia

"Everyone needs an Advocate"

“Everyone needs an Advocate”

  • Current Advocacy
    • Reforming the ATO
    • Small Business Tax Tribunal
    • Fair Contracts
    • Fixing Disputes/Prompt Payment
    • The ‘Gig’ Economy
  • Past Advocacy
    • Submissions
    • Defending ABN Contractors
    • Work Safety
    • Independent Contractors Act
    • Owner-Drivers
    • International Labour Organisation
    • Independent Contractors: How Many?
  • SEA Submissions
    • Submissions
    • Independent Contractors: How Many?
  • Members-only Articles
    • About ICA
    • Contract Design and Templates
    • Independent Contractors Act
    • Practical Assistance
    • Taxation Matters
    • What is an Independent Contractor?
  • News Categories
  • NotAboveTheLaw

Did Victorian Government Breach its OHS obligations by not having a Hotel Quarantine Plan?

Part 1: An explanation of the law

December 2020

1. Obligations under the OHS Act

  • A person, entity or organisation has legal obligations under the OHS Act to do things to minimise and prevent harm to others.
  • The obligation applies to the private and public sectors.
  • Breaches of the Act can occur for what has been done or not done.
  • The standard to be met is to do what is ‘reasonably practicable’.

Although the Act has application to ‘work safety’

  • The Act has a broad reach in what constitutes ‘work’ and a ‘work site’. The operation of the Hotel Quarantine is well within the ambit of the OHS Act as a ‘worksite.’
  • Even though the Act applies to keeping ‘employees’ safe, the obligations require responsible parties to keep ‘others’ safe. This includes members of the public.

2. Hotel Quarantine Failure breaches of the OHS Act

  • The hotels used for quarantine were/are ‘worksites for the purposes of the OHS Act.
  • It would be an expectation under the OHS Act that in the management of the Hotel Quarantine that the government would have had a document or documents detailing the policies and procedures for the management of the hotel quarantine.
  • Investigations demonstrate that the Victorian government had no such detailed plan, policy or procedures documents.
  • Evidence submitted under oath by the Secretary of the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services states that “… there were no plans in place for a mandatory hotel quarantine program for returned travellers…”.
  • Failure to have such a plan is of itself prima facie evidence of a breach of the OHS Act by the Victorian government.
  • Consideration has to be had as to whether the need to have a plan for hotel quarantine was ‘reasonable and practicable’.

3. Are prosecutions required?

The evidence is that the Victorian government had no plan for the management of the Hotel quarantine program for international travellers. The WorkSafe Authority has a requirement under the OHS Act to investigate the Victorian government, responsible departments, Ministers and public servants for such a failure.

4. Comparative example

If, for example a cinema complex failed to have a written policy and procedures manual for the emergency evacuation of the cinema complex (worksite), the failure to have such an evacuation manual/procedure, is of itself a breach of the Act. This applies even if no evacuation were to ever occur and no person were ever put at risk. It is the failure to have the plan that creates a breach of the Act.

The requirement for such plans is fundamental to OHS compliance.

A failure of the Worksafe Authority to investigate and consider prosecution of the Victorian government for its failure to have a hotel quarantine management plan undermines the entire integrity of the Victorian worksafe system. This establishes a dangerous precedent whereby other businesses and organisations would claim immunity for similar worksafe breaches in the future.

5. Two fundamental questions

The evidence is, and the government has admitted, that it had no plan for the management of hotel quarantine.

Two key questions need to be addressed if a prosecution were to be justified on the basis that no management plan existed:

  • Was it ‘reasonable and practicable’ to expect that a pandemic was to occur?
  • Was it ‘reasonable and practicable’ to expect that hotel quarantine for returning passengers would be required?

This research exercise accumulates facts relevant to these two key questions.

6. Key questions

  • Was the pandemic unprecedented?
  • Was it reasonably practicable to prepare for the pandemic?

See here for the next level assessment.

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube


Protected Member $40/month
Standard Member $20/month
Campaign Member: You decide $
Compare Member Benefits
Please support our efforts.
We depend entirely on your $
Join Now!


Click here to $  support
Not Above The Law – Info

We explain the case for prosecutions

Sign up to our mailing list!

* indicates required




Reforming the ATO

ABC confronts ATO” (3′ 42″)
More info here

SEA Email Help

Contact us here (choose “Membership” from the options)

Authorised SEA Content

The use of Self-Employed Australia’s logo or its website materials requires our prior written consent. Self-Employed Australia does not issue printed material. All authorised content is published on our website or on our officially linked social media pages. Any material found outside these sources is unauthorised and constitutes a breach of copyright. If you wish to report any suspect material, please contact us.

SEA Advice Referral

Self-Employed Australia does not provide tax, financial, legal or other professional advice. We seek to understand members’ situations and make referrals to our partner, outsourced, self-employed specialist Lawyers, Accountants, Insurance Brokers and other professionals. More information here.

Footer

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in