• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Content Disclaimer
  • Contact Us

Self Employed Australia

"Everyone needs an Advocate"

“Everyone needs an Advocate”

  • Current Advocacy
    • Reforming the ATO
    • Fair Contracts
    • Fixing Disputes/Prompt Payment
    • The ‘Gig’ Economy
  • Past Advocacy
    • Submissions
    • Defending ABN Contractors
    • Work Safety
    • Independent Contractors Act
    • Owner-Drivers
    • International Labour Organisation
    • Independent Contractors: How Many?
  • SEA Submissions
    • Submissions
    • Independent Contractors: How Many?
  • NotAboveTheLaw
    • Robodebt
    • Hotel Quarantine 2020
    • Chemical Fire 2019
  • Be Your Own Boss

The truth needs to be told about the ATO.  Drop the charges against Richard Boyle

July 29, 2022 by Self-Employed Australia

richard-boyle-protestEarly this week the trial for ATO whistleblower Richard Boyle was to start in the Adelaide District Court. However, Richard and his entire legal team came down with Covid and the trial could not proceed.

But the trial cancellation didn’t stop us joining a rally of citizens calling for Richard’s case to be dropped. In the photo are SEA members Annette and Tina making our views known. The Australian Financial Review gave Richard’s case good exposure on Monday.

Background

On 9 April 2018 an ABC Four Corners exposé was aired that exposed malpractice and small business abuse by the Australian Taxation Office. Ex-ATO debt collection officer Richard Boyle featured in the program, detailing malpractice in the ATO’s debt collection division. Essentially the ATO was raiding people’s bank accounts in defiance of its required rules.

Richard had lodged an internal report to the ATO detailing the malpractice which was ignored. Richard then followed lawful whistleblower procedures in going public. However, the ATO still went after him, initially with charges that would put Richard in jail for 161 years.

Richard’s report on ATO malpractice was subsequently proven to be accurate by both the Inspector-General of Taxation and the Small Business Ombudsman. A Senate Committee criticised the ATO.

Why the charges should be dropped

We have detailed why the charges against Richard should be dropped. See our full reasons here.

In summary, our reasons include:

  • Richard’s whistleblowing was the moral thing to do. This impacts upon the appropriateness of the prosecution.
  • The charges against Richard are the product of a witch-hunt.
  • The length and expense of a trial is a waste of public resources.
  • There is a need to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice.

In undertaking Richard’s prosecution, the Commonwealth risks creating the impression of conducting a cover-up of evidence of maladministration by the ATO. If not a cover-up, then at least a diversion from the truth. This seriously diminishes the confidence of the public in the tax administration system. Further, it seriously diminishes trust in the justice system itself, by delivering the potential impression that the justice system is likewise involved in covering up maladministration by the ATO.

Filed Under: News Updates, Richard Boyle, Rule of law, Self-Employed Australia, Tax Reform

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Mulholland says

    August 8, 2022 at 12:24 am

    Just curious is there a possible link between the events of Richard Boyle exposure on small business to the closures( ROBODEBT) of multiple independent businesses,then the ” gig economy,and the covid having its negative impact on earnings,then the hotel quarantine bringing the health system crashing
    Cannot seem to work out why thousands of teachers lose their jobs and nurses only for the government look to outsource from NZ and Srilanka job shortages.
    The last time there was a shift to the economy was in 2000 the introduction of GST now there seems to be a push to target self employed and small businesses..
    Wasn’t the introduction of the ” fairwork commission and ombudsman” established to ” encourage work choices? Sounds counter productive to close businesses down and directing people of where and how or what they should or shouldn’t choose?
    Don’t people try to pay of mortgages early to escape the ” debt trap?” How does losing a right to choose their work choices improve one’s lifestyle.
    Does one work to ” escape slavery” or improve their ” lifestyle?”
    Was this a ” pandemic or as the public news say ” plandemic?”
    How does going out of one’s way to destroy everyday people an opportunity to work and make a living actually help the economy?
    Working for less and expecting,sounds like positive adverse effect.
    What’s the similarity between ” exploitation ” and “Extortion?
    They both have the same effect,deprive you of your rights!!
    It’s a word game.
    As the saying goes,If you can see through the illusion,you part of the solution!

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • SEA historical website January 31, 2024
  • Closed doors January 31, 2024
  • We ask you: Make your views known to independent Senators! — Urgent January 9, 2024
  • We ask Senator Pocock: Does he support the outlawing of self-employment? January 5, 2024
  • Ooops! Common sense turns into double-cross. Trojan Horse December 14, 2023
  • Loophole Update – Common sense at last – Movement! December 7, 2023
  • Dancing with Alice at the Mad Hatter’s tea party – Loophole Bill farce November 29, 2023
  • Thank goodness for the independents! Loophole Bill is a huge PILL November 24, 2023
  • Loophole Bill – State of play November 20, 2023
  • You don’t save something by destroying it! November 13, 2023

Categories

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in