Self Employed Australia

"Everyone needs an Advocate"

“Everyone needs an Advocate”

Independent contracting

Independent Senators – Your small business future in their hands

by

independent-senatorsHave no doubt that the future of your right to be your own boss, to be a small business person, is in the hands of the seven independent Senators in parliament.

On Monday and Tuesday this week I ‘walked the corridors’ of Parliament House, Canberra, meeting with Senator’s advisors and others on the government’s 284-page, highly complex Loophole (Industrial Relations) Bill. I’ll be returning to Canberra several times before Christmas.

We’ve provided you an overview of the Bill and a detailed analysis of how the Bill trashes contract law as defined by the High Court. We’ll be supplying more analysis progressively. But be very clear on the central thrust of this Albanese government Bill.

This is the greatest attack against Australian small business people ever seen. More details below.

What should be happening are proper protections for small business people. One of these is the unfair contract laws. Seriously stronger unfair contract law come into effect on 9 November and, across the board, companies are upgrading their contracts. But government departments are not subject to these laws. That is, government departments can have unfair contracts with small business people and get away with it.

On Monday morning (16 October), independents Senator David Pocock, Senator Jacqui Lambie and MP Allegra Spender co-sponsored a small business breakfast in Parliament. The large room was packed. I had a chance to push this issue.

I put it to the Senators that this must be fixed. A one-paragraph amendment to competition law would stop this double-standards shocker.

Here I am putting this proposition. Senator David Pocock is behind me on the left of the picture.

small-business

But back to the Bill. The consequence of this Bill is that:

  • 2 million self-employed people will be declared to be employees. This will kill incomes.
  • 970,000 people who use gig work for top-up income will have their incomes trashed.
  • 8 million casuals will be forced to be full/part time employees, losing 6 per cent of their income.

For just the casual workers, people on:

  • minimum pay will lose up to $3,062 a year;
  • average pay will lose up to $5,354 a year.

That is, the Albanese government is engaged in a massive attack against people’s incomes.

This is no exaggeration. These conclusions are based on hard analysis of the words in the legislation with clear documentation on what this means. But be alert. The Albanese government is conducting a scandalous misinformation and disinformation campaign to push this Bill through.

We have more detailed explanation papers that we’ll release shortly. You can judge for yourself. We’ve already supplied these to the independent Senators and MPs and they are listening.

What the Loophole (IR) Bill means for you – some detail

by

loopholeIn our news alert to you last week we gave you a broad overview of the government’s IR ‘reform’ Bill, the (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023. We said that we’d progressively provide you our detailed analysis and this is the first instalment.

This first analysis explains how the Bill aims to override and neuter the Australian High Court’s determination of who/what is an independent contractor. This is a pretty serious move. This is NOT the addressing of some ‘loophole’ in the existing Fair Work Act, an Act created by the Rudd/Gillard Labor governments in 2009.

I’ve posted a Substack article analysing this part of the Bill. It’s around an 8-minute read. We hope this will give you some clarity. It’s free to access.

First step understanding—summary

But just to understand how serious this is, at its core, the Bill seeks to destroy the very legal basis of commercial and contract law in Australia. It’s staggering, but this is what the Bill seeks to do.

The most significant proof supporting this statement is that the Bill itself states its intent to repudiate, neuter and overturn the declaration made by the High Court in February 2022 on what constitutes commercial and employment contracts. (I show the clause in the Substack post.) The High Court must be ignored, according to this Bill.

The Bill is based on an underlying position that no individual Australian has the capacity, maturity, intelligence or wit to earn their income through the commercial contract. In effect, its ‘says’ that Australians are incompetent halfwits who must be denied their right and capacity to be self-employed, to be their own boss.

It is a Bill that denies the spirit of aspiration, ambition and ‘get up and go’ that so defines much of what it means to be human. As self-employed people we probably don’t understand the extent to which our very existence affronts the existing establishment status quo. This Bill is an attempt to squash us. This is not an exaggeration, but a statement of fact based on the wording of the Bill.

The 284 pages of the Bill contain many sub-agendas scattered throughout, but all captured within the central theme stated above. It’s a complex read, but to analyse the Bill, we had to split it into its ‘bits’ by colour-coding it. By doing that we were able to identify its sub-agendas and discover its overarching theme.

The parliamentary process

The Bill is being investigated by a Senate Committee with hearings currently underway. The Committee website is here and submissions here. Curiously, our 13,000-word submission has not yet appeared on the website.

Parliament sits from this Monday 16 October for 2 weeks. I’ll again be in parliament, ‘walking the halls’, talking with Senators and MPs and their advisers on the Bill. We’ll keep you updated.

A bill to destroy self-employed small businesses across Australia

by

small-businessWe really need to let you know what’s going on with the new industrial relations Bill, called the ‘Loophole Bill’.

Hold on to your hats. This is something much more radical and far-reaching than anyone could have expected. To call it a Bill closing ‘loopholes’ is to lie. Its contents prove the lie.

The Bill proposes a transformation of key, core underpinnings of the Australian economy and society. It is perhaps the most radical change of its type seen since Federation.

To remind you, the Bill:

  • Is 284 pages long, with a 521-page Explanatory memorandum.
  • Covers multiple agendas.

The government had wanted this passed before Christmas this year, but the Senate has delayed it until February next year. The Senate is holding an inquiry. Submissions were due last Friday, 29 September. We’ve put in a submission that we can’t make public until the Senate Committee formally accepts it.

Putting our submission together was a formidable exercise and we haven’t even covered all the issues. But our 13,000-worder gets stuck into core, major items.

In summary:

The Bill seeks to make commercial transactions subject to industrial relations regulation.
It will do this in relation to commercial transactions undertaken by individuals in the earning of their income.

In practical terms, the Bill will outlaw:

  • the bulk of self-employment;
  • digital (gig) platform operations in Australia;
  • self-employed people from earning their income through digital/gig platforms; and
  • self-employed owner-drivers;

as well as:

  • casual employment.

Further, the Bill will:

  • Damage competition law in Australia, creating opportunity for a further concentration of economic power by big business.

In short, the Bill will make a huge percentage of Australian small businesses illegal. This is why describing the Bill as ‘radical’ is warranted and accurate.

Our line-by-line analysis of key terms, sentences and structures of Bill shows how it achieves the above by:

  • Overriding the High Court’s determinations on ‘employee vs self-employment’.
  • Breaching Australia’s International Labour Organisation obligations to protect the status of self-employment.
  • Overriding Australia’s competition laws and limiting the power of Australia’s competition regulator (the ACCC).
  • Defining the commercial contract as an employment contract.
  • Regulating self-employed people as employees.
  • Regulating digital (gig) platforms to remove their commercial basis.
  • Regulating owner-drivers as employees.

We’ll release our analysis of the Bill to you in ‘bits’ over the next few weeks so you have a chance to absorb it all.

Breaking News – Anti-self-employed IR Bill delayed

by

spaghetti-delayedWe informed you yesterday about our efforts in Parliament House on Monday around the new anti-self-employed industrial relations Bill. We called it a ‘spaghetti bowl’ of legislation.

The government had wanted to have the legislation passed before Christmas. However, according to media reports, the Coalition and the independent Senators have this evening voted to push consideration of the Bill out to February of next year.

The Senators have declared that the Bill requires considerable time to understand it. This is not surprising. One prominent labour law professor, Andrew Stewart, is quoted in the media as saying “The drafting is very complex… that it’s as impenetrable as what many of us think. And I don’t envy you [the Senators] trying to make sense of it.”

We think this move from the Senators is common sense and we thank them for this.

As we said yesterday, we are going to seek to break the Bill up into its bits so that we can understand it before doing our analysis. We will share this with the Senators and on our website for SEA members/supporters.

100,000 (plus) hear the message – Self-employed under attack

by

Spectator-TV-100Recently I was interviewed on Spectator TV where I explained the attack against self-employed people being prepared by the Albanese government. I presented a simple example of how the promise to provide ‘holiday pay’ was in fact a con that will take money away from people.

Someone has taken a 5-minute clip from the longer interview and posted this on Twitter. This has broken through the 100,000 views mark in just over 24 hours of posting and continues to grow.

You can access the twitter post here.

Spectator-TV

We hope this provides a simple explanation.

We started our campaign on this in March this year – the Be Your Own Boss campaign where we provide lots of detail.

We have many more direct discussions in the pipeline with Senators and MPs and their advisers.

War Against Tradies

by

war-against-tradiesLast week we discussed the common sense displayed by the Victorian government in its approach to the gig (‘employee-like’) worker issue. Yes—record in you diaries that we’ve actually praised the Victorian government on this issue!

But Victoria’s common sense seems not to be having any impact on the nonsense from the Federal (Albanese) government on the issue. We’ve been explaining in our ‘Be Your Own Boss’ campaign that the Albanese government’s ‘employee-like’ agenda, if enacted in law as it promises, will strip away the right of each of us to be our own boss (self-employed).

Be Your Own Boss

Our current campaigning is focused on trying to block in the Australian Senate the ‘employee-like’ legislation that the Albanese government says it will create this year. We’re having positive, initial discussions with Senators. But a lot of work will need to be done once the draft legislation appears.

Understanding the importance of this issue is remote for anyone not intimately familiar with the legal difference between the commercial and the employment contract. That’s no surprise. So, we need to keep explaining.

I’ve posted a piece on Substack where I describe the predictable impact of the promised ‘employee-like’ laws on Australia’s self-employed tradies. You know, the people who actually do things, like plumbing, electrical work, and so on. Yep, the people who actually make sure that all that stuff actually works!

The promised ‘employee-like’ laws will set up a framework that will force every independent tradie into the clutches of the industrial relations system by imposing a de facto, compulsory unionism on housing tradies through the back door.

Currently, tradies are their own bosses because they work under commercial contracts not employment contracts. The legal trick the government has promised is to create legislation that requires commercial contracts to be controlled by the Fair Work Commission (FWC). Effectively this trashes the notion and structure of a commercial contract, and by legislation turns commercial contracts into pseudo-employment contracts.

Once this is done, construction unions will proceed to impose collective enterprise agreements across the housing sector, just as they do with the commercial construction sector. Read the full explanation here.

ATO

You’ll be well aware of our long-running campaign to have the ATO treat self-employed, small business taxpayers with fairness. The ATO has just released an update to its Taxpayers’ Charter following a review. We had input into the review.

The Charter is supposed to lay out the ATO’s commitment to you in terms of how it will deal with you as a taxpayer and your rights. We’re having a good look at the revised Charter and will put together an analysis soon.

Common sense about ‘Gig’ from the Victorian government

by

gigHere’s one for the history books. We’re actually complimenting the Victorian government on its ‘gig economy’ policy. Until now we’ve been a strong critic of the Victorian government on this.

In July 2020 the Victorian government released its report into the gig economy. (Just to remind you, we explained what gig work is last week—e.g., Harry Styles, etc). The research from the report is actually very good. (7% of the workforce ‘do’ gig, but less than 0.2% do gig for full-time income. That is, it’s ‘top up’ income for the bulk of gig workers.)

BUT, Recommendation 6 of the Victorian report effectively called for the outlawing of independent contracting (self-employment). However, contrary to this recommendation, the policy now released by the Victorian government is very sensible. It doesn’t do anything to harm self-employed people, doing gig or direct work, but puts in place good protections within a commercial framework.

This is exactly the sort of thing we support and want to see. And it’s completely counter to what the Albanese government has plans to do, which will be highly destructive of small business.

Here’s the Victorian government’s policy. It covers ‘gig’ platforms (e.g., Uber, etc). It has six standards as follows:

Victorian Government gig platform code—Standards

  • Platforms should provide consultation processes, forums or committees to allow for discussions with non-employee on-demand workers…
  • Platforms should ensure that the terms and conditions of the applicable contract are clear and able to be understood by non-employee on-demand workers
  • To assist non-employee on-demand workers to make an informed decision about whether to accept work, platforms should provide them with key information in writing about:

I. what they will earn should they complete a job, and how earnings are calculated
II. typical costs associated with the performance of work
III. their conditions of work
IV. the factors that affect how work is allocated by the platform (such as customer ratings).

  • Fair and Transparent Independent Dispute Resolution.
  • Platforms should not inhibit non-employee on-demand workers from freely associating to pursue improved terms and conditions relating to their work arrangements, where permitted by law.
  • Platforms must comply with their duties under the OHS Act.

Now this is common sense, as opposed to the Albanese government’s planned nonsense.

This Victorian government policy now forms a major part of our advocacy work in the Federal Parliament. We’re actively talking with independent Senators asking them to oppose the Albanese government’s plan. We’re now promoting the Victorian Standards to Senators as the way to go forward.

Our campaign is only just warming up with a full range of trips to Canberra and other places organised and being planned. Many thanks to the support we’ve been receiving from many of you which enables this critical work.

Should gig workers like Mick Jagger, Beyoncé and Harry Styles be worried?

by

In late April, we alerted you to the new Australian Taxation Office (ATO) reporting rules for gig workers. We had some queries asking, “what are ‘gig’ workers?” That’s a pretty sensible question.

Last week I posted the answer on Substack. You can read ‘To Gig or Not to Gig’ (it’s free!)

Yes, icons of global popular culture such as Mick Jagger, Beyoncé and Harry Styles are all gig workers.

And (believe it or not) gig work is even older than Mick Jagger! Wow! I wonder if Mick’s eight children—particularly his youngest child, six-year-old Deveraux—would realise that Mick’s a gig worker? They probably wouldn’t care…

But the ATO does care about who is a gig worker. And the Albanese government, under Minister Burke, wants to kill off gig. But we assume that it wouldn’t give PM Albanese any ‘Satisfaction’ to attack Jagger, and anyway ‘You Can’t Always Get What You Want’.

But the ATO is really looking at this as a Satellite issue (apologies to Mr Styles).

What the ATO is focused on is the type of gig work that’s done through platforms. No, not the ‘stage’ platforms that Mick, Beyoncé and Harry work on, but the ‘tech’ platforms that Uber and other such companies use to organise work. The ATO calls it the sharing economy.

What the ATO wants to do is track your income if you work as a ride-share driver, rent out your flat/house/room for short-term accommodation and so on. The ‘platform’ companies will be required to report your income to the ATO starting on 1 July 2023 (i.e., soon!) The platform companies will require information from you, notably your:

  • ABN and business/trading name (where applicable);
  • first, middle and surname/family name (for individuals);
  • date of birth (for individuals);
  • residential or business address;
  • email address and telephone numbers; and
  • bank account details.

But we suspect they’d have all this information anyway. The ATO has provided a detailed explanation here.

And just to ensure the message gets through, to steal a line from Beyoncé, these new gig reporting rules also apply to Single Ladies! (But presumably won’t apply if you’re still in nappies.)

Campaigning is under way—Defending your right to Be Your Own Boss

by

campaigningWe thought we’d give you an understanding of the mechanics of our campaign to try and stop the Albanese government from implementing its ‘employee-like’ agenda.

We explained early in May that the government had started the implementation process with the release of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations’ (DEWR) consultation paper.

Our first task was to assess and respond to the paper. We lodged our long submission (11,000 words) to DEWR and in late May provided you a brief overview. The reason for the long submission is simple. The government is throwing up a concept—‘employee-like’—which at first glance could appear reasonable. But it’s only when you delve into the detail of what this means that a full understanding is possible. And it means a direct attack upon your right to be your own boss, to be self-employed.

The next phase in our campaign started last week. This involves focusing on the independent Senators that the government needs to pass any legislation in the Senate. There are seven independent Senators. The government needs four of them to pass legislation.

Last week we began the engagement process with the Senators. It needs to be understood that all Senators and MPs are incredibly busy trying to comprehend a huge range of complex issues. Our responsibility is to present our arguments clearly, factually and as concisely as possible. To this end we’ve produced a four-page summary of our position.

Last week we had initial discussions with staff of some Senators and had one Senator ask us to come to Canberra to explain the issues in person. We did this and had a very productive discussion. It was pleasing to have this level of interest.

We’ve been conducting pro-self-employed advocacy campaigns for over 20 years and we’ve learnt one thing. It’s essential to sit down with Senators and MPs and explain one’s position face-to-face. We’re committed to this. And it’s not just independent Senators we seek to talk to, but also the government itself, the opposition and independent MPs.

This costs money, of course, and this is where your membership fees go.

For example, a one-day trip to Canberra (from Melbourne) usually involves:

  • $500 in airfares, $100 for buses, taxis, etc.

And staying overnight in Canberra (if needed) is expensive during Parliament sitting days—usually starting at around $250 a night (just for basic accommodation!!!)

The government plans to introduce its contentious legislation later this year. To run our advocacy campaign, we anticipate that around eight to ten trips to Canberra will be required before years’ end.

If you’d like to help fund any of those trips, you can do so through our dedicated campaign membership link here.

There’s quite a ‘battle’ going on, with the ACTU (unions) putting out a very aggressive ‘research’ paper which attacks the High Court and is hugely misleading on many fronts. It’s this sort of thing that we need to explain to Senators and MPs otherwise the union agenda will prevail.

We’ll keep you informed.

Labor’s ‘employee-like’ agenda assaults competition law

by

employee-likeWe informed you on 7 May that the Federal government’s anti-small business plan was progressing. It released a Consultation Paper on 13 April requiring submissions by 12 May. We’ve lodged our submission opposing the planned legislation. The submission is here.

Sorry, but the submission is long—yep, 11,000 words.

The reason for the length is that the government’s plan is presented as if it’s a ‘tweaking’ of law and of limited application. It’s not. It’s a massive assault against the very principles and practices of contract that determine your right to be your own boss, to be self-employed. This can only be understood by understanding the detail.

We’ll explain the detail in shorter ‘chunks’ through this and a series of future news alerts. If you have queries, please contact us.

Competition law ‘protects’ self-employed, small business people

Today we cover the grave threats posed to competition policy and law, the jurisdictional authority of the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC), and the right of people in Australia to earn their income as a small business person.

Competition law regulates commercial contracts.

Employment law regulates employment contracts.

  • The government’s plan is to allow employment regulation to regulate commercial contracts.

This is a massive step across a fundamental threshold.

The plan is to legislatively redefine commercial contracts to be employment contracts on the alleged grounds that some self-employed people are ‘employee-like’.

This defies the High Court’s declaration in February 2022 (Personnel Case) that:

  • “The employment relationship with which the common law is concerned must be a legal It is not a social or psychological concept like friendship…”

In effect, the plan is to ‘invent’ a new legislative contract form that is outside common law to thwart common law contract.

This also breaches Australia’s International Labour Organisation obligations where the ILO declared in 2006 that:

  • “National policy for protection of workers in an employment relationship should not interfere with true civil and commercial relationships…”

Competition clash

The provisions will immediately set up a clash between competition law and employment regulation. Specifically, the ACCC and the Fair Work Commission (FWC) will both be required to regulate commercial contracts that have been declared ‘employee-like’, but each with different and opposing public policy objectives. The ACCC to prevent collusion over pricing and ensure competition. The FWC to facilitate price collusion thereby creating the circumstances for anti-competitive behaviour.

This is being done under the pretext that some self-employed people need ‘protections’.

But protections are already in place:

  1. Sham contracting laws in Australia are possibly the strongest in the world.
  2. The Independent Contractors Act outlaws payment below similar pay to an employee.
  3. ‘Beefed up’ unfair contract laws begin in November 2023 and will be handled by the ACCC.
  4. Collective bargaining for the self-employed is already available through the ACCC.
  5. Improved, easier dispute resolution can be made available through small business ombudsmen, etc.
  6. New ‘pay on time’ laws are currently being considered.

We are now undertaking a major advocacy campaign directed at Federal MHRs and Senators. We’ll keep you informed.